| Priority A: Home Ownership Neighborhood Rehabilitation |
Activities |
Strategy/
Objective |
Geographic
Distribution |
Goals |
Accomplishments |
1.
Housing Rehabilitation and Repair |
1 |
Neighborhood Development Areas
See Map #2 |
Improve neighborhoods by providing financial
assistance to homeowners including direct or matching grant, subsidized bank loans,
technical assistance. Rehabilitation goal was to complete 275 homes in 2000. |
279 rehabilitation of single owner-occupied
units was closed in 2000 in active neighborhood development areas. Includes 12 two-family
owner occupied homes (24 units). |
2.
Neighborhood Housing Petition Program |
1 |
Petition Areas
See Map #3 |
Enable Akron residents in eligible areas to
petition the City for a housing improvement program in their neighborhood. Program
combines housing inspections and code enforcement with financial assistance for repairs.
Goal was 30 households. |
Rehabilitation of 27 single, owner occupied
units was completed in active petition areas. |
3.
Neighborhood Based Non-Profit Housing Rehabilitation |
1 |
Low Income Service Areas |
Preservation of 20 deteriorated low income
owner occupied houses by Community Housing Development Organizations. |
4 units completed. |
4.
Emergency Home Repair |
1 |
City wide |
Provide health and safety housing repairs to
extremely low income homeowners. Goal was 125 households. |
97 grants for repairs made. |
5.
Paint Program (Greater Westside Council of Block Clubs) |
1 |
Club service area: Wards 3 and 4; other
service areas such as Lane-Howe |
Paint homes of elderly and low income
households. Goal was 30 households. |
Service to 34 households. |
6.
Christmas in April |
|
Citywide |
City/County/construction union joint venture
to provide repairs to 18 houses of homeowners who are at least 60 and disabled and meet
low income guidelines. |
Service to 18 households. |
7.
City Paint Program |
1 |
Designated Areas |
City supplies paint, owner labor. |
Service to 17 households. |
| Priority B: Rental Housing Rehabilitation |
| Activities |
Strategy/
Objective |
Geographic
Distribution |
Goals |
Accomplishments |
1.
Rehabilitation of Rental Housing |
1 |
Neighborhood Development Areas and Petition
Areas.
See Map #2 and Map #3 |
Preservation of rental housing stock in
moderate to extremely low income groups. 45 households to be served. |
Rehabilitation of 67 units was closed in NDAs
and petition areas. |
2.
CHDO/Non-Profit Developers Rental Rehabilitation |
2 |
Throughout Central City |
Preservation of rental housing undertaken by
non-profit organizations 24 very low income households to be served. |
No CHDO/Non-Profit rental rehab in 2000. |
3.
Nonprofit DevelopersLow Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) Program |
2 |
Qualified census tracts.
See Map #5 |
Increase the supply of affordable rental
housing units for low income households. Enable low income households to lease to own
their homes. Goal was 35 households. |
No LIHTC rehabilitated rental housing in
2000. |
|
| Priority C: New Housing Construction |
| Activities |
Strategy/
Objective |
Geographic
Distribution |
Goals |
Accomplishments |
| Nonprofit New Housing
Construction UNDC |
2 |
UNDC service area |
Construction of 20 single family
homes selling $68,900 to 125,000. |
11 homes completed. |
| Rental Housing ConstructionEANDC,
Annunciation Terrace |
5 |
EANDC service area and Broad
Street |
Construction of 85 rental units
for very low income. |
40 units completed by EANDC. 50 units of Annunciation Terrace completed in 2000. |
|
| Priority D: Homebuyer Assistance |
| Activities |
Strategy/
Objective |
Geographic
Distribution |
Goals |
Accomplishments |
| Home Purchase Incentive Program |
3 |
Neighborhood Development and Petition Areas;
Lane-Howe |
Overcome barriers to home purchase by
providing down payment assistance in conjunction with housing rehab funds. |
4 cases closed. |
|
| Priority E: Support Facilities and Public Service |
| Activities |
Strategy/
Objective |
Geographic
Distribution |
Goals |
Accomplishments |
| HOME MAINTENANCE TRAINING |
1, 4 |
Active Neighborhood Development Areas (NDAs)
and Petition Areas |
Train up to 250 homeowners to properly
maintain their homes. |
The program provided 12 home maintenance
seminars that were attended by 70 residents. The seminars provided attendees with the
skills necessary to perform home repairs. |
| SUPPORTIVE SERVICES |
4 |
Active NDAs |
The aggregate goal for all supportive
services was to assist 50,000 - 55,000 low and moderate-income persons or households. |
|
A.
Home Accessibility Program.
Administered by United Disability Services |
|
|
Home modifications to increase accessibility
and independence. |
The program provided home modifications for
12 families with disabled family members. The program provided 8 wheel chair ramps, 1
stair lifts, 3 bathroom modifications, 4 porch lifts and hand rails. |
B.
Consumer Credit Counseling Service.
Administered by Family Services of Summit County (FSSC). |
|
|
Financial counseling services for low to
moderate income families. |
Conducted Debt Management and Individual
Budget Counseling for 124 individuals. Conducted 12 money management classes. |
C.
Crouse Caring Community Program.
Administered by Children's Services Board |
|
Crouse CD Area |
Coordinated community services designed to
encourage a public/private/ volunteer partnership. |
Served 1,400 people. Developed neighborhood
Block Watch Groups in cooperation with the Akron Police Department. Improve educational
opportunities for Crouse School Students. Promotion of services which support families
including the monthly Community Family Nights, Weekly Community Coffee Hour for community
residents and others and Counseling Services. Developed Information Resource Center.
Summer youth activity 2-week program for over 38 children. After school activities
included a 16-member gospel choir, a 51-member Arts and Crafts Appreciation Club, 20
member martial arts program, 20 member 10-week African dance program, a 11 member Crouse
Knights Chess Club, a 15-member after school Science Club, 16 member girl scout troop, 20
member boy scout troop. Mentored 30 youth. |
D.
Family and Schools Together.
Administered by FSSC. |
|
Goodyear Area |
For elementary students with academic and
behavioral problems. Provides a family setting to modify behavior. |
24 group sessions were attended by 167
persons, 32 families at Seiberling and Hotchkiss schools. The activities: family meals,
"buddy time", parent groups, "special play", "kids time",
etc. were a part of each weekly group session. |
E.
Information and Referral services.
Administered by Info-Line, Inc. |
|
Citywide |
Provide information and referral of local
services to persons in need of human services. |
Provided 59,854 units of information and
referral service. The top information and referral request for services were emergency
food, housing, utility, medical and clothes assistance. |
F.
Crisis Intervention Program.
Administered by Victims Assistance |
|
Citywide |
The program, working with the Police
Department, provides crisis intervention and victim assistance services to Akron
residents. |
Direct services were provided 1,365 victims
of various crimes. |
| YOUTH PROGRAMS |
4 |
Active NDAs |
Support education, crime prevention and
medical counseling specifically for 4,500 to 5,000 youth that are low income. |
|
A.
Summer Day Camp Program.
Administered by CYO and Community Services, Inc. |
|
|
Day camp for children 11 years and under,
over night resident camping for youth 12 years and over. |
The program provided services to 58 youth. |
B.
Tutorial Assistance Program.
Administered by Youth Education Services |
|
|
Individual or small group tutoring to
students having difficulty in one or more subject. |
Provided tutoring services to 14 youth. |
C.
Promoting Adolescents Through Health Services (PATHS).
Administered by Children's Hospital Medical Center of Akron |
|
|
Comprehensive adolescent health service
program. The program provides health, mentoring and tutoring services. The following
activities were offered: medical, family life and sex education, employment assistance,
case management, fitness, performing acts, cultural enhancement and education. |
The program served 25 youth. |
D.
Child Assault Prevention Program.
Administered by Akron Summit Community Action Agency |
|
|
Provides assault prevention services to
preschool/ elementary/school children, parents and staff. |
The program served a total of 2,734 teachers,
parents and children (1,314 children) at the following schools: Findley, Seiberling,
Pfeiffer, Lincoln, Smith, Forest Hill, Heminger, Leggett, Margaret Park, and Robinson.
Services were also provided to pre-schoolers at the Five-Points, Waterloo and Cedar Head
Start Programs. Fourteen teachers staff in-service session, education workshtops, 19
parents, 26 preschool childrens workshops, and 89 elementary childrens
workshop. |
E.
Say Yes to Tennis, No to Drugs |
|
|
Uses tennis to develop supportive
relationships with at risk youth. |
Provided weekly tennis instruction and drug,
alcohol, gang violence prevention classes to 24 youth. |
F.
Summer Employment Program.
Administered by Boys & Girls Club |
|
|
Provide summer enrichment and employment. |
The program provided employment opportunities
to 27 youth at 20 hours per week for 10 weeks. |
| SENIOR PROGRAMS |
4 |
Active NDAs |
Service to low income senior citizens. To
serve 1,500 to 2,000 elderly. |
|
A.
Retired Senior Volunteer Program |
|
|
Provide meaningful volunteer assignments to
retired seniors. |
The program provided 16 volunteer sites. The
64 volunteers completed 13,500 volunteer hours. |
B.
Homemaker Service Program.
Administered by Senior Workers Action Program (SWAP). |
|
|
Provide temporary in-home homemaker and
health care to older adults living alone. |
The program provided 1,422 hours of home care
service to 219 older or handicapped residents. Chore Services were provided on an as
needed basis. |
C.
Senior Citizens Outreach Program.
Administered by SWAP. |
|
|
The program provided the following services
for seniors: Case Management, Client Assessment, Forms Preparation Assistance, etc. |
The program provided 23 client assessments
and 384 personal contacts and client referrals. |
D.
Lifeline Emergency Alarm Response System.
Administered by Info-Line, Inc. |
|
Neighborhood Development Areas |
Electronic protective service for elderly and
handicapped persons living alone. |
The program provided units to 67 residents. |
FAIR HOUSING PROGRAM
Administered by Fair Housing Contact Service |
3, 4 |
city-wide |
Improve minority access to rental and for
sale housing. Service area includes Akron and surrounding cities. |
The program processed 132 discrimination
complaints, conducted 43 audits of the rental sales market, and 2,689 tenant landlord
services. Home ownership counseling provided to 130 persons and 22 training sessions or
public forums. |
|
| Priority F: Homeless Persons, Individuals and Families Assistance |
| Activities |
Strategy/
Objective |
Geographic Dist./Location |
Goals |
Accomplishments |
| ACCESS Step II |
4 |
Census Tract 5069 245 S. High Street |
Transitional shelter for single,
homeless women. |
10 single persons served. |
| Community Aids Network |
4 |
Micah House
667 N. Main Street |
Transitional housing and
essential services for persons infected with HIV/AIDS. |
8 single persons served. |
| H.M. Life Opportunities Transitional Housing
Program/Supportive Housing Demonstration |
4 |
Broad Street
Copley Road
Treeside Drive |
Transitional housing and
supportive services for homeless persons and families leaving temporary shelters. |
29 families served: 79 total persons served. |
| Damage Deposit Program / Fair Housing Contact
Service |
4 |
Citywide |
Provide security deposits for
families leaving transitional and emergency shelters. |
120 families assisted. |
| Battered Women's Shelter Step II |
4 |
Locations suppressed |
Transitional housing for battered
women. |
91 families served; 29 single persons served;
321 total persons served. |
| Legacy III |
4 |
Census Tract 5069 244 West Center Street |
Transitional housing and
supportive services for homeless women recovering from chronic substance abuse. |
8 persons served. |
| ACCESS |
4 |
Census Tract 5031.01 230 W. Market Street |
Operating and support services. |
104 families served; 195 single
persons served; 516 total persons served. |
| Salvation Army Booth Manor |
4 |
Census Tract 5066
219 S. Maple Street |
Shelter to homeless families. |
72 families served; 13 single
persons; 274 total persons served. |
| Shelter Care Safe Landing |
4 |
Census Tracts 5075 & 5036
39 W. Cuyahoga Falls Avenue (1 boy, 1 girl)
587 Seiberling Street plus 8 other locations throughout Summit County |
Emergency housing for homeless youth. |
497 families served; 1,465 youth
served; 2,995 total persons served. |
| Battered Women's Shelter |
4 |
Locations suppressed |
Emergency shelter for battered women. |
145 families served; 126 single
persons served; 525 total persons served. |
Harvest Home
(Non-Federal Shelter) |
4 |
24 N. Prospect Street |
Emergency shelter |
85 families served
467 single persons
Total of 718 persons served. |
|
| Non-Housing Community Development Plan |
| Activities |
Strategy/
Objective |
Geographic
Distribution |
Goals |
Accomplishments |
| Waiver Demolition Program |
2, 5 |
Citywide |
Demolition of vacant, blighted housing
infeasible to rehabilitate and representing a threat to health and safety. Structures
demolished include houses, garages and commercial buildings (includes asbestos removal).
Goal was 85 housing units. |
A total of 8 commercial buildings, 44 homes
and 143 garages were razed under this program. |
| Neighborhood Business District Program |
4 |
Middlebury and Copley Road East areas |
Provide funds to enable business to undertake
property revitalization within low income areas. Goal was 15 businesses. |
2 land acquisitions
4 businesses assisted |
| Enterprise Community Fund Small Business
Assistance |
4 |
Enterprise Community and Enterprise Zone |
Revolving loan fund for small businesses.
Job creation/retention of minority owned businesses. |
2 businesses received loans, totaling
$45,467. 5 jobs created. |
| Minority Business Technical Assistance
Program |
4 |
EC/EZ |
Provide loan guarantee to new minority
businesses on a matching basis with bank. Provide technical assistance to 290 minorities,
small business. |
24 individuals received technical assistance. |
| Public Improvements |
1, 2 |
NDAs and Petition Areas |
Reconstruction of streets, sidewalks, curbs,
storm sewers and street trees. $1,535,000 budgeted in 2000 plan. |
Over $2,000,000 in public improvements
completed in 2000. |
| Neighborhood Partnership Program |
4 |
City |
Grants for small neighborhood based projects
and innovative ideas. Goal 30 organizations. |
7 neighborhood - based organizations
assisted. |
| Grocery Store Development |
4 |
West Akron, Middlebury |
Assist with development of 1 to 2 full
service grocery stores. |
Opened grocery store in West Akron. |
|
|
B. Actions Taken to
Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing
The City utilizes Fair Housing Contact
Service (FHCS) to promote the policy and practice of equal housing opportunity. FHCS
activities are broken down into three major divisions: client services, research and
public/industry education.
Client Services Division -
provides direct advisory and referral services to residents with investigation, housing
counseling and requests for information, tests the housing delivery system for
discriminatory patterns and practices and investigates reported incidents of housing
discrimination and harassment.
Research Division - staff
review, investigate and monitor the local lending industry for compliance under fair
housing laws and conduct research of local housing markets, housing providers and
communities to assess the effectiveness of fair housing programs.
Public/Industry Education -
combines the outreach and affirmative marketing activities of the agency. This division
also provides for education of real estate professionals, lenders, public officials, and
community groups and offers various speaking engagements and community events to promote
awareness of fair housing.
In 2000, the City of Akrons
Department of Planning and Urban Development conducted a series of meetings of the Fair
Housing Task Force to complete the Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice required
to complete the Citys Consolidated Plan. As a HUD-funded Entitlement Community, the
City of Akron is charged with identifying impediments to fair housing choice and preparing
a plan to address them. Over 60 representatives from municipal, community, and civic
organizations having information or ability to provide information regarding Fair Housing
Choice participated.
The mission of the Fair Housing Task Force
was to research, review, and identify current and potential impediments to fair housing
choice in the City of Akron. An impediment to fair housing is any policy or practice that
causes or allows housing discrimination to occur. Some of these are unintentional, such as
advertising for a male or female roommate.. There was a consensus that clear guidelines,
definitions, and procedures should be available and readily accessible to the public, as
well as to government entities, lenders, mortgage brokers, realtors and others associated
with housing. Fair Housing Task Force agreed to remain intact and meet quarterly to review
Fair Housing concerns and progress.
ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING
The City of Akron, Ohio, Department of
Planning and Urban Development commissioned an Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing
Contact Service, a nonprofit fair housing organization in Akron, Ohio. This Analysis of
Impediments was commissioned according to Akron's obligation as an entitlement grantee of
the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) that it will affirmatively
further fair housing.
In 1998, Fair Housing Contact Service,
under contract from the City of Akron, Department of Planning and Urban Development,
conducted an Analysis of Impediments (AI) to fair housing choice. This Analysis examined
the public and private housing sectors in relation to possible housing impediments. The AI
was conducted according to the suggested format for the analysis of impediments listed in
the Fair Housing Planning Guide (1996).
Since the AI was completed in the fall of
1998, the City of Akron has been cooperating with HUD concerning the findings and
implementation. To date, there has been no final resolution to the outstanding issues. The
City of Akron plans to solicit further comments from citizens and community organizations
about impediments that may exist and means to overcome those impediments. However, since
no changes have been officially made to the AI of 1998, the following summary outlines the
actions being taken by the City to address the impediments identified. |
IDENTIFICATION OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING AND ACTION PLAN MATRIX
| 1. Government Policies |
| Identified Impediments |
Actions to Eliminate Identified Impediments |
Primary Responsibility |
Partners |
Timetable |
A.
Housing density and land use requirements restrict the location of affordable multi-family
developments. |
The City of Akron will maintain its practice
of issuing conditional uses for multi-family and group home development where appropriate
in order to promote affordable housing. |
City of Akron |
Fair Housing Task (FHTF) |
3 |
B.
The zoning code has not received a major revision in 25 years. |
Zoning Code will be reviewed to determine the
guidelines that discourage affordable housing. |
City of Akron |
FHTF, Interested Community Organizations |
2 |
C.
Developers of new housing in Akron are not providing for accessibility upgrades
(e.g. wheelchair ramps, bathroom modifications and wider doors), of housing. |
New housing design will be encouraged to
provide for accessibility upgrades at the inception for possible future use. |
Home Builders Association, (HBA), City of
Akron Building Department, Prospective Developers |
Disability Advocate Groups Architects |
2 |
D.
Families and individuals with limited financial resources have limited housing
choices. |
Developers will promote
mixed-income housing developments; City will promote economic opportunities in
economically distressed areas for low and moderate income persons. |
City of Akron |
HBA |
3 |
E.
The greatest percentage of funding in City programs to rehabilitate affordable
housing does not address the oldest and most deteriorated neighborhoods of the City. |
Support the development of
CDCs to improve housing in the oldest areas of the City. Develop more housing activity in the oldest areas of the City. |
City of Akron |
Lenders |
1 |
F.
Rental assistance programs and credit repair programs are not able to meet the
need for this service that helps secure affordable housing. |
Organizations provide education
awareness to prospective or current tenants/homeowners concerning but not limited to
credit repair and assistance programs. |
AMHA, Family Services, Banks
(credit repair) |
United Way, University of Akron,
Kent State University |
1 |
G.
There does not seem to be a mechanism to identify housing need in Akron. |
Principal agencies will monitor housing need
in the City of Akron to identify potential housing shortages. |
AMHA, City of Akron |
HBA, University of Akron Homeless providers,
CDCs, |
1 |
H.
Accessibility requirements in multi-family developments are not being enforced
(wheelchair users do not have access to front of building). |
Accessibility and building requirements will
be available upon request at the Building Departments. |
City of Akron, Summit County |
FHCS, Tri-County Independent Living, Ohio
Dept. of Development |
1 |
I.
The concentration of low-income public housing for families in the cities of
Akron, Barberton and Cuyahoga Falls limits the housing choices for low-income families. |
The City of Akron will continue
to seek 1:1 development of low-income housing in the City vs. outside the City. |
City of Akron, Akron Metropolitan
Housing Authority (AMHA) |
Summit County, NEFCO |
3 |
J.
Necessary household retail services are limited in areas of the city where
affordable housing exists. |
Encourage the private sector to
establish groceries, pharmacies, banks, etc. |
City of Akron |
FHCS, CDC, Churches, Block
Clubs, Banks, Local Boards of Trade |
3 |
K.
There is an education gap among the public on various aspects of conditional use policies. |
The Zoning Division will provide a written
statement of policy with regards to conditional use process and have it available upon
request. |
City of Akron Zoning |
|
1 |
L.
Certain sections of the City have significant amounts of housing and
infrastructure that needs replacement. |
The City will maintain a coordinated effort
to upgrade public improvements and housing investment in the oldest sections of the City. |
City of Akron |
|
3 |
|
| 2. Education and Outreach |
| Identified Impediments |
Actions to Eliminate Identified Impediments |
Primary Responsibility |
Partners |
Timetable |
A.
Except for Fair Housing month, there is very little information to promote
awareness of fair housing and fair lending issues and policies. |
Utilize media resources to promote Fair
Housing and increase awareness of fair lending issues and problems. |
Fair Housing Contact Services (FHCS), Akron
Board of Realtors (ABR), Summit County, AMHA, Akron Summit Public Library |
Media, Infoline, Banks, Legal Aid Providers,
Community Organizations |
1 |
B.
Effective service by agencies to the disabled in securing affordable housing is
hampered by ineffective communication. |
Utilize public forums to disseminate fair
housing literature (lending, credit information, emergency assistance). |
Tri-County Independent Living |
Media |
1 |
C.
Presentations on complicated issues relating to lending or credit are difficult
to understand by the intended consumer. |
Presentation on these subjects will be
crafted in simple language, clearly structured and graphically displayed (e.g.
audio-visual display). |
Banks, City of Akron, Summit County |
Akron Metropolitan Housing Authority,
CDCs |
1 |
E.
Fair Housing Contact Service lacks the financial resources to advertise its
services aggressively and communicate fair housing law to the public. |
FHCS will utilize television and radio Public
Access, Op-Ed pages in newspapers and special reports in local magazines to periodically
promote Fair Housing/Fair Lending policies; FHCS should pursue additional funding. |
FHCS |
Local Media Outlets, lending organizations |
2 |
|
| 3. Lending and Credit |
| Identified Impediments |
Actions to Eliminate Identified Impediments |
Primary Responsibility |
Partners |
Timetable |
A.
Influencing lending activity by area lenders is limited because public
information on lending activity is not widely known. |
Continue review of local lending practices
using Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA) Data. Public forums discussing reports will be
held annually. |
State of Ohio Office of the Comptroller of
Currency, Local Banks |
Fair Housing Contact Services, City of Akron,
Fair Housing Task Force |
1 |
B.
The lack of bank branches in minority or low-income neighborhoods reduces the
opportunity for low income or minority persons to know of and take advantage of lending
options. |
Outreach by banks will be continued in poor
and minority communities especially to distinguish themselves from predatory lending
facilities. Community Reinvestment Officers are encouraged to become more creative in
promoting Bank programs. |
Local Banks |
Mustard Seed Development Center A Monitoring
Group FHTF Predatory Lending Task Force |
1 |
C.
Banks and other financial institutions do not know the market in poor and
minority census tracts. |
Banks will partner with established
neighborhood organizations to promote lending information. |
Local Banks, Community Development
Corporations |
Community Development Organization AMHA
Community Centers
Churches |
2 |
D.
Residents of poor and minority census tracts do not trust banks and other
financial institutions. |
Community Development Corporations will work
to become loan originators in partnership with lending institutions. |
CDCs, Local Banks |
LISC, Foundations |
3 |
E.
Regardless of their Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) ratings, banks are allowed
to operate business as usual without repercussions. |
Penalty provisions of CRA should be
strengthened and enforced. Local organizations will
publicize poor records locally and communicate objections to regulatory agencies. |
Office of Comptroller of the Currency |
FHCS |
2 |
F.
Subprime lenders operate in neighborhoods without monitoring from any agency. The
marketing used, especially in poor and minority communities, have made these communities
particularly vulnerable to high interest rates, and poor value of service, i.e. (deceptive
practices), i.e. high fees, high loan to value ratio, over appraisals, large number of
foreclosures. |
Suspected Predatory Lenders/practices will be
monitored and reported to the Better Business Bureau. |
|
City Akron
Bar Association
FHCS
Prosecution FHCS
Predatory Lending Task Force |
3 |
|
| 4. Insurance |
| Identified Impediments |
Actions to Eliminate Identified Impediments |
Primary Responsibility |
Partners |
Timetable |
A.
The lack of data on property or mortgage insurance redlining restricts the
publics ability to influence this activity. |
Partner with University to conduct research
to examine the occurrence of redlining by various insurance companies. |
University of Akron, Kent State University,
City of Akron, Summit County |
FHCS, FHTF, HUD |
2 |
B.
There are few forums held to discuss insurance policies and practices. Citizens
in poor and minority census tracts may not be receiving information regarding fair
policies. |
Using seminars and other promotional venues,
educate current and potential policyholders on insurance issues and how to deal with
insurance companies. This will provide tools to equip policy holders with coverage and
reduce cancellation of policies. |
Local Insurance Agencies/Brokers |
Housing Network, CDCs, Block Clubs,
Universities |
2 |
|
| 5. Enforcement |
| Identified Impediments |
Actions to Eliminate Identified Impediments |
Primary Responsibility |
Partners |
Timetable |
A.
Adequate funding is necessary in order to continue monitoring tools to identify
discrimination in fair housing choice, (i.e., site testing). |
Continue to provide site testing to identify
discriminatory acts/policies to fair housing choice. The results of the tests will be
utilized for community education and awareness. |
Fair Housing Contact Service |
City of Akron, University of Akron, SC |
1 |
B.
Approved accessibility standards not always enforced during review process |
Inspectors will review required accessibility
standards at appropriate stages of building process. |
City of Akron, Summit County |
FHTF, FHCS, NEFCO, Tri-County |
2 |
C.
Housing developments in the City of Akron receiving federal funds do not always
exhibit diversity of occupancy |
Entities receiving federal funds for housing
projects will have affirmative marketing plans developed and implemented in collaboration
with local fair housing organizations. Development
Corporations will achieve diversity within housing.
Support Public Housing Deconcentration plan developed by
AMHA. |
City of Akron, Summit County, non-profit
development corporations, (CDC) |
Housing Network, NEFCO, HUD, AMHA, Home
Builders |
2 |
D.
A broad-based group does not systematically review Fair Housing policies and
practices in the community. |
Maintain the Fair Housing Task Force as a
body to assess fair housing impediments in the City of Akron and provide ongoing analysis. |
FHTF |
FHCS |
1 |
E.
Some owners of rental property are not aware of fair housing regulations and
requirements. |
Distribute fair housing and landlord/tenant
information at the time of Rental Registration with the Akron Health Department. |
City of Akron |
FHCS, Akron Board of Realtors |
1 |
F.
Housing developments are often not diverse in the City of Akron. |
Entities developing housing will be
encouraged to have Affirmative Market Plans. |
FHCS |
CDCs |
3 |
|
| 6. Special Needs |
| Identified Impediments |
Actions to Eliminate Identified Impediments |
Primary Responsibility |
Partners |
Timetable |
A.
Architects, inspectors, and construction managers do not always know
accessibility guidelines for multi-family development resulting in costly renovations. |
Periodic dissemination of guidelines or
presentations to architect or construction trade groups. |
FHCS, Tri-County, City of Akron |
|
3 |
B.
There is a significant lack of rent assisted, accessible housing for families who
have a family member using a wheelchair. |
Provide financial assistance for
accessibility renovations. Encourage the development
of handicapped accessible or adaptable housing on all projects receiving federal funds.
Promote the development of handicapped accessible or
adaptable housing in new private developments. |
Tri-County, FHCS, AMHA, City, County |
FHTF, United Disability Services |
2 |
C.
Persons with disabilities may have difficulty receiving needed services in a
timely manner. |
A clearinghouse of providers will be
established to ensure persons with disabilities have access to services. |
Tri-County, MRDD Board |
City, County, FHTF, UDS. CSS, AMHA, ADM Board |
3 |
D.
There is a pattern of inefficient delivery of services which jeopardizes housing
persons with disabilities. |
Monitoring by FHTF and engage in dialogue
with those providers. |
FHTF |
|
3 |
|
|
C. Evaluation of Affordable Housing
HUD requires the jurisdiction to discuss
its accomplishments and the accomplishments of other entities in providing assistance to
extremely low, low and moderate income renter and owner households, during the reporting
period. The following table outlines the number of households actually assisted by income
group, compared to goals of the FY 2000 Annual Plan.
In carrying out its Rehabilitation
Programs, the City closed in IDIS a total of 296 cases of homeowner assistance in 2000. An
additional 12 cases of renter assistance were closed. The IDIS report for 2000 housing
rehabilitation activities identifies as closed any rehabilitation case in which all funds
for that project have been spent prior to the end of the program year and so entered in
IDIS. The program completion data in the following table reports the number of completions
entered in IDIS in 2000.
|
HOUSING PROGRAM COMPLETIONS
NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING REHABILITATION (HOMEOWNERS) |
Proposed Goals |
Goals for
Households by MFI Income Group |
Households
Assisted by MFI Income Group |
| |
HOME |
CDBG |
| |
0 to 30% |
31 to 50% |
51 to 80% |
Over 80% |
0 to 30% |
31 to 50% |
51 to 80% |
All |
Housing Neighborhood
Development Program |
21 |
33 |
78 |
78 |
24 |
58 |
68 |
120 |
Housing Petition Program |
8 |
11 |
11 |
|
3 |
3 |
3 |
7 |
| Minor and Emergency Home Repair Programs |
125 |
15 |
--- |
--- |
--- |
--- |
--- |
97 |
Paint Programs |
15 |
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
51 |
Christmas in April |
|
18 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
18 |
NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING REHABILITATION (RENTERS) |
Proposed Goals |
Goals for
Households by MFI Income Group |
Households
Assisted by MFI Income Group |
| |
HOME |
CDBG |
| |
0 to 30% |
31 to 50% |
51 to 80% |
Over 80% |
0 to 30% |
31 to 50% |
51 to 80% |
All |
Housing Neighborhood
Development Program |
10 |
10 |
20 |
|
--- |
--- |
--- |
7 |
NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING PROGRAM |
Proposed Goals |
Goals for
Households by MFI Income Group |
Households
Assisted by MFI Income Group |
| |
HOME |
CDBG |
| |
0 to 30% |
31 to 50% |
51 to 80% |
Over 80% |
0 to 30% |
31 to 50% |
51 to 80% |
All |
CHODO/CDC |
|
85 |
|
|
45 |
45 |
|
--- |
|
|
D. Continuum of
Care Narrative
The Akron/Summit County Continuum
of Care represents a broad collaborative effort of homeless persons and supportive
services. Homeless service providers have worked together to develop a system to provide a
continuum of services to homeless individuals, families, mentally ill, and disabled in the
community. The City has a system in place that provides the homeless with not only
shelter, but supportive services to equip them with the necessary tools to assist them in
overcoming this period in their lives. Homeless shelter providers have been meeting to
further evaluate the needs in the community and to identify any existing gaps that may
exist. Agencies and service providers continue to meet to identify additional gaps in the
system.
Substantial steps were taken to identify
and address the needs of homeless persons and the special needs of persons that are not
homeless but require housing. These efforts resulted in the development of a Continuum of
Care strategy for the homeless and the expansion of existing service to meet demands or
fill identified needs. Two committees were convened.
The Continuum of Care Community Committee,
consisting of representatives from banks, hospitals, the University, foundations, private
businesses and neighborhood organizations, will meet on a quarterly basis. The Committee
will be involved in coordination of the Continuum of Care application process, regular
updates on the homeless environment in the Akron/Summit County area, and agency updates.
The Community Service Coordinating
Committee, consisting of shelter and supportive service providers, will meet on a monthly
basis. The Committee will discuss the coordination of services, share agency information,
deal with problems regarding services delivery, work to develop a community wide plan,
oversee the refinement of a vision/strategy focusing on the homeless, review components of
the system currently in place and develop a data gathering/tracking system.
In 2000, nine proposals were submitted in
the 2000 Continuum of Care application to fill gaps in existing services. Emphasis
continues to be placed upon projects addressing transitional housing and permanent housing
needs as well as programs facilitating the transition of permanent housing. Four agencies
received funding in 2000.
Additional information on actions taken to
address the needs of homeless and special needs persons can be found in Section 5.(a) ESG
Activities and in Section 1(a) table, Priority F.
E. Other Actions indicated in Strategic and Action Plans
Addressing obstacles to meeting
underserved needs.
To minimize the negative effect of public policy on the availability of affordable
housing, the City of Akron has continued educating the public on the need for affordable
housing, and promotes a diversity of affordable housing programs. The City will continue
meeting with lenders who serve the Akron area and holding public meetings to inform
citizens of housing programs.
Actions and steps continue to be taken to eliminate identified gaps and to strengthen,
coordinate, and integrate the institutions and delivery system. Some actions are the
continued practice of one-stop permitting, coordinated social services with housing
treatment areas, and participation on committees/boards involved in housing and social
service delivery.
Fostering and Maintaining Affordable
Housing
The City is committed to provide adequate land for a variety of housing types through
Zoning and Land Use and Development Guide Plan updates. Akron will pursue other funding
sources for affordable housing as they become available and continue working with
non-profit housing developers.
Eliminating Barriers to Affordable
Housing
Akron has worked to eliminate excessive site development standards through its Zoning Task
Force and has worked to eliminate obsolete and prescriptive building code requirements
through the Building Task Force.
Overcome Gaps in Institutional Structures
Akron has worked to eliminate identified gaps in institutional structures, and integrate
institutions and delivery systems. Actions taken include pursuit of other funding sources
for affordable housing. Quarterly meetings with the Akron Metropolitan Housing Authority
(AMHA), building programs with lenders serving the area, and continuing to work with
non-profit housing developers. The City attends meetings throughout out year with the
Housing Network and CHDOs, as well as with various citizens committees. The City also
works with the University of Akron, drawing on its strengths in education, training,
research and evaluation.
Public Housing Improvements and Resident
Initiatives
The City of Akron holds meetings throughout the year with the Akron Metropolitan Housing
Authority (AMHA) to discuss issues of mutual concern and to update progress of any new
housing programs or developments. Continuing communication will help ensure coordination
on programs and monitor progress.
AMHA is implementing its improvement program. Steps include increasing the overall
occupancy rate and vacant unit turnaround, converting units to marketable size, and
modernizing other units, instituting new management techniques, and continuing to address
drug and related problems. Modernization includes an $11 million renovation of the Joy
Park Homes, with over 200 units.
AMHA has encouraged resident involvement in management and participation in home
ownership. Initiatives include family activities, counseling, and offers for home
ownership.
Evaluation and Reduction of Lead based
Paint Hazards
The Akron Health Department is the lead agency for the Akron Lead-Based Paint Hazard
Control Program. Its Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention Program (CLPPP) has provided
extensive screening and intervention to children under six years old identified with
elevated blood lead levels. The current program screened 3,616 children in 2000 through
the Akron Health Department Clinics. Other children are screened at Children's Hospital
Medical Center, and those exhibiting elevated results are referred to Akron's CLPPP for
case management and environmental interventions. The end-of-year caseload was 122
children. One hundred forty-seven inspections/risk assessments have been done by referrals
from the CLPPP and other agencies.
The Akron Lead-Based Paint Hazard Control Program's goals are to reduce the lead hazards
in at least 5,822 homes of low to moderate income families with children under the age of
six; conduct recruitment and training of minority and low income contractors and workers;
provide training for area residents to prevent lead poisoning; and develop a public health
promotion program.
In 2000, 133 applications for assistance were received; of these, 87 have been approved
for grant/deferred loan assistance. The program has 25 licensed lead abatement contractors
and 18 licensed lead abatement workers.
The Tenant Relocation Plan is consistent with the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real
Property Acquisition Act of 1970, the Uniform Relocation Act Amendment of 1987 and the
Department of Housing and Urban Development rules and regulations, which require that
persons involuntarily displaced as a result of federally funded projects and programs will
not suffer disproportionate injuries as a result of this program.
Two relocation homes were rehabilitated and cleared for occupancy in 1999. In 2000, they
were used by 36 families in need of relocation. There were also 8 families who used hotel
relocations and 39 arranging their own relocation with subsidy provided for food and
mileage.
Outreach and Educational initiatives are a collaboration of the Akron Childhood Lead
Poisoning Prevention program with Block Clubs, Community Groups and Agencies. Outreach
takes place at government offices, community centers, places of employment, etc. A mobile
health clinic will also be used.
Ensuring Compliance with Program
Requirements
The City monitors implementation of its Consolidated Plan in conformance with all
applicable regulations. Akron is in regular contact with HUD officials in the Columbus,
Ohio office, and recently hosted a site monitoring visit.
The Rehabilitation and Comprehensive Planning Sections of the Department of Planning and
Urban Development and the Health Department meet quarterly to discuss the progress of the
Neighborhood Development Program. At this meeting, the appropriate timing for opening and
closing of activities in various areas, utilization of staff, promotional activities,
operational procedures and distribution of effort throughout the program are discussed.
Reduce the Number of Persons Living Below
Poverty Level
In December of 1994, the City was selected as an Enterprise Community. As an Enterprise
Community, the City receives federal funds and special federal consideration for growth
and revitalization of the community. The Enterprise Community Strategy and process is
important to the development of the Consolidated Plan as many common needs and solutions
exist.
Akron has been involved in human service programs dedicated to providing supportive
services to people emerging from poverty. The City also works with AMHA, CHDOs, CDCs, and
supports their efforts to train and uplift people in poverty. Akron works in partnership
with area agencies on Economic Development programs for low income, inner city
neighborhoods. These activities are outlined earlier in this report.
F.
Leveraging Resources
The City actively encourages the leveraging
of private funds for neighborhood development and community projects.
Homeowners who are below 80% of the median
income are provided additional funds for housing rehab in the form of a deferred loan. By
requiring a lien to be placed on the property for the amount of the deferred loan, funds
can be recycled. At sale of the property or upon vacation of the property, the owner
repays the funds and the lien is released.
The Housing Rehabilitation program requires
residents to commit matching funds based on income, and promotes the use of subsidized low
interest home improvement loans through local lenders.
The City of Akron currently works directly
with several local banks in Akron's Housing Rehabilitation Program. Agreements with
National City Bank, Key Bank, and First Merit Bank, allow for reduced interest home
improvement loans and Charter One Bank provides first mortgage refinancing to eligible
applicants. The city subsidizes the home improvement interest rate down to a rate of 6%.
Residents with incomes exceeding 80% of Area Median Income are required to match the grant
funds from the City.
Under the HOME program, a 12.5% matching
requirement for 2000 funds applied. The City utilized local funds (income tax, etc.) from
the street improvements program for HOME funded neighborhoods as match.
Leveraged funds totaling over $1.5 million
are reported in the tables at the end of this report.
G. Citizen
Comments
The majority of comments and
concerns expressed by various groups and citizens throughout the year were for the need
for additional Community Development (CD) projects in more areas and the need for more
Federal money for these projects. The following is a brief summary of citizen and
community groups concerns, comments and funding proposals regarding the City of Akron's
CD/HOME program. Copies of correspondence, newspaper ads, tape recordings of meetings,
etc. are on file with the Department of Planning and Urban Development.
The annual public hearing on CD Needs
usually generates many requests, proposals, and comments. The City of Akron held its
meeting August 19, 1999 for the FY00 CD Program. Approximately 28 persons attended the
meeting representing neighborhoods, community organizations as well as social service
agencies. The meeting had a format where the audience was divided into three discussion
groups. This format resulted in a wide variety of comments and active participation by
those attending. Notes from this meeting were summarized in Akron's 2000 Consolidated
Plan.
A presentation was also made
describing the requirements for preparation and submission of the annual Grantee
Performance Report and its availability to citizens for review. A CDBG Program Progress
Summary for the period January 1, 1998 through December 31, 1998 was also given.
The Planning Commission Public Hearing on
the FY2000 CD/HOME Program was held in October 1999. Representatives of community
organizations and social service agencies were in attendance.
H.
Self-Evaluation
In its Consolidated Plan, the City has
identified the housing needs of low to moderate income citizens and developed strategies
to help meet those needs. The strategy is summarized in the Mission Statement: Maintain
and conserve Akron=s affordable housing stock and neighborhoods, expand home ownership
opportunities, and address housing needs of lower income persons including the homeless
and special needs populations.
The City of Akron has successfully met the
overall goal of the community planning and development programs to develop viable
communities by providing decent housing and a suitable living environment and expanding
economic opportunities principally for low and moderate income persons.
Neighborhood Development Areas
Over the past 25 years, targeted
development areas consisting of 400 to 700 households have been established throughout the
central city. These are areas of fundamentally sound housing stock and a substantial
number of homeowners with low to moderate incomes. These neighborhoods receive
concentrated attention to help maintain or improve the quality of housing, including
financial assistance, home buyer assistance, education, training and support services.
Residents are encouraged to bring homes up
to health and safety code standards through home improvement grants or loans, following
City inspections. Buildings that are beyond repair may be removed and the cleared parcels
can be reutilized for new home construction. The City supports several nonprofit agencies
that build new homes for low to moderate income homebuyers. Akron also invests in
necessary public improvements, from pavement to sewer lines to street trees. The City
coordinates the work of a variety of social service agencies to meet the needs of NDA
residents from youth through seniors or people with special needs.
In 2000, this concentrated neighborhood
development activity has taken place in 10 Akron neighborhoods. The Goodyear, Manchester,
Noble, Aqueduct and Mason Park neighborhood areas were in the final stages of the program.
The Glover, Crouse, Victoria Bisson, and Kenmore II Development Areas are underway.
For those areas in the final stage of the
Redevelopment Program, 100% of homes have been inspected - a total of 3,208 residences. Of
those, 2,925 have been brought into compliance with Akrons housing code through
2000. This average compliance rate of 91% demonstrates a substantial improvement in the
quality of housing for low to moderate-income residents of some of the Citys older
neighborhoods. Plus, the investments in public improvements and the increased access to
human and community services throughout development areas add up to an overall improved
quality of life.
Residents of Akrons newer development
areas can look forward to similar improvements. Virtually 100% of the planned housing
inspections have taken place in the Glover and Victoria development areas and over 60% of
inspections in the larger Crouse area were completed by the end of 2000. In the older
Glover and Crouse areas, compliances are at 65% and 41% respectively after somewhat
more than two years since they opened. Most development areas take five or more years to
complete.
Neighborhood Petition Areas
The innermost ring of the City surrounding
the Central Business District consists of neighborhoods of predominately renter occupied
housing and very low to extremely low income. However, there are small, stable
neighborhoods within this zone that can benefit from concentrated improvement efforts.
Akron extends the opportunity for financial assistance and public improvements to
neighborhoods whose residents petition for assistance.
Though the impact of improvements is not as
dramatic in these more isolated areas of improvement, the quality of housing is never the
less improved.
For example, in the Leroy/Thornton, Rhodes,
Fern/Bellevue, Victory/Paris, Cuyahoga, LaCroix, Celina/West Thornton, Robert/Weeks,
Campbell, 5th Avenue and Fuller Petition Areas, a total of 108 homes were
inspected. Of those, 36% or 39 were brought into compliance by the end of 2000. The
combination of low income and absentee landlords clearly impedes progress in even a small
area of 60-80 homes. Petition areas also take several years to complete.
In 2000, the Fifth/Fuller/Robert Weeks
Petition Area and the Campell Petition Area were contracted out to CHDOS (East Akron
Neighborhood Development Corporation and WENDCO, respectively.
Homeless
Akron's strategy for homeless and special
needs populations has been to address not only the immediate needs for crisis
intervention, food and shelter, but to reduce dependence on shelters through transitional
and education programs.
During 2000, the City funded 9 emergency
and transitional housing programs through the Emergency Shelter Grant Program. The
Consolidated Plan strategy indicates the Citys three funding priorities:
- rehabilitation of emergency and transitional facilities
- operating costs of shelter activities
- essential services, especially those that assist shelter
residents to secure permanent housing.
The City visits all of the agencies on an
annual basis to ensure that all of the funded activities are achieved to provide safe,
dry, and clean housing to the homeless. Agencies are required to provide a specified
number of bed days on an annual basis. Monthly reports are required to monitor the number
of homeless served as well as bed day provided. All activities and goals for 2000 have
been successfully completed.
Evaluation of Development Programs
Akron's concentrated approach to community
development has effectively met the objectives of providing decent housing and a suitable
living environment. Though strictly speaking goals for residential rehabilitation and
related activities may not be met on a yearly schedule, programs are generally producing
the planned results. The year 2000 census is expected to reveal that population and
housing values have remained stable or improved within the Neighborhood Development areas.
Some adjustments are anticipated to Akron=s
program in upcoming Consolidated Plans:
The first may be to set a smaller optimum
size for Neighborhood Development Areas. Experience has shown that redevelopment is more
effective in more compact areas of less than 300 households. The health inspections are
more manageable, repair work is accomplished in a more timely fashion, the participation
rate is generally greater in smaller neighborhoods and the impact more noticeable. City
resources are limited to a particular neighborhood for a shorter period of time.
Participation is usually not as high in
Petition Areas as in Neighborhood Development Areas. This is most likely due to the
greater number of rental properties in Petition Areas, lower household incomes and poorer
housing condition. Akron has implemented a rental registry program with the goal of
identifying owners of all rental properties in the City.
The City has increased the amount of
deferred loans available to low and moderate income households to $5,000. This is in
addition to the $5,000 grant and 6% loan funds also available to low/moderate households.
While Akron=s program is effective at
preserving low to moderate income neighborhoods, it does not address the issue of economic
geographic stratification in the City. Generally, homebuyers of above moderate incomes
tend to settle on the outer edges of Akron, or in the suburbs. Stability and economic
viability of neighborhoods could be enhanced through modest investments by middle income
householders.
SECTION 2. CDBG FUNDS NARRATIVE
A. Relationship to Consolidated Plan
In the Final Statement of Community
Development Objectives submitted in November, 1991, the City of Akron indicated Community
Development funds would be used for Housing and Neighborhood Revitalization and Public
Services. The City is attempting to fulfill those purposes by meeting the objectives
listed below.
Housing and Neighborhood
Revitalization
"Prevention or elimination of slums or
blight."
The City is preventing slums or blight from occurring through a concentrated multi-faceted
program of revitalization in neighborhoods that are experiencing decline but have not
reached a stage of serious deterioration. This is achieved through mandatory code
enforcement, housing rehabilitation assistance, and public improvements. Slums and blight
are eliminated by the selective removal of deteriorated structures or ones with a negative
environmental impact.
"Preservation and upgrading of the
housing stock."
The City has an aging housing stock. Through activities of code enforcement and housing
rehabilitation, outdated or deteriorated mechanical or structural conditions will be
improved to current standards. This will extend the useful life of the housing stock.
"Upgrading of public improvements
within the housing treatment areas, including street, walk, and sewer construction and
reconstruction." Within Akron's neighborhoods the public infrastructure has aged with
the housing stock or was never fully developed. These public improvements add to the
function and appearance of the neighborhood and complement the housing rehabilitation.
"Strengthen the tax base and the
employment base."
The City is working toward increasing the tax and employment base by encouraging the
development and expansion of small businesses. This is achieved in cooperation with local
lenders by providing loan guarantees on private loan funds.
Public Service
"Provision of social services to
support the physical improvement of the neighborhoods."
The City of Akron recognizes that
improvement to the physical environment and living conditions of its residents impacts on
one aspect of its citizens' lives. To address the myriad circumstances that affect
segments of our community, the City of Akron funds programs directed towards youth, women,
senior citizens, handicapped, the poor, and the environment.
Each CDBG assisted activity undertaken by
the City of Akron, with the exception of Planning and Program Administration, meets one of
two national objectives - benefit to low and moderate income persons or aid in the
prevention or elimination of slums or blight.
The description of population served is
outlined in Section 1 C. The tables in that section and Section 1 A. detail the extent to
which CDBG funds were distributed among categories of housing need.
B. Changes in Objectives
There have been no changes in program objectives in 2000.
There is some discussion of possible
program changes in the self-evaluation section of this report.
C. Pursuit of Resources
The description of activities for 2000
demonstrates that the City of Akron has pursued other resources and actively implemented
its Consolidated Plan. For example, Akron has encouraged and supported the use of State
Low Income Housing Tax Credit funds to build new homes in the City. Akron also makes use
of State Issue 2 Transportation funds in conjunction with CDBG funds for public
improvements programs.
D. Explanation of any funds not
used for National Objectives
Not applicable.
E. Occupied Real Property
Rehabilitation occupied homes is a key
element of Akrons housing program. The City minimized displacement in the CDBG
funded Housing Areas by emphasizing rehabilitation over clearance and replacement.
The majority of dwellings rehabilitated are
single-family units. In order for the mandatory rehabilitation to be affordable, the City
utilizes grants, low interest loans, deferred loans and investment loans (full costs,
deferred loans to very low income elderly homeowners). These funds are paid back when
title transfers.
Acquisition of residential dwellings is
primarily due to environmental/incompatible land use reasons; and thus results in a
reduced number of households being displaced. The City's Development Services Division is
responsible for providing Relocation Services. Prior to entering negotiations to acquire
property, the Relocation Section interviews site occupants as to their needs and provides
information - i.e., a General Information Notice and Fact Sheet - regarding Relocation
Assistance/ Services.
In the CDBG funded Housing Rehabilitation
Program, the Relocation Section monitors each project to insure a General Information
Notice is served to the tenant-occupant in a timely manner by the property owner. At the
time the owner of rental property submits an application for financial assistance, the
property owner is required to show proof tenants in the project will not be economically
or physically displaced. Shortly after the owner is approved for financial assistance, an
Information Packet is sent to the property owner. This packet includes a detailed
explanation of the owner's responsibilities to include serving a General Information
Notice to each tenant and having tenants complete a questionnaire. An "Owner's
Report" must be submitted documenting current/prior tenant occupancy,
pre-rehab/post-rehab rent and a description of the dwelling to include bedroom location
and measurements, as well as utility costs.
Until a review of the above information is
completed, no project will be approved for financial assistance. Monitoring continues
during the ongoing rehabilitation work through project completion.
Minimal displacement occurred as a result
of Code Enforcement. The City has established an optional relocation program to pay moving
expenses using the fixed-rate schedule. In addition, the Housing Authority gives a
preference to lower income tenants for occupancy under Section 8 and properties owned by
the Authority. Referral to counseling services is provided.
F. Economic Development
The City of Akron has worked in
cooperation with the Enterprise Community Fund (ECF) on economic development activities in
central city, low income and minority areas. Activities included the Minority Business
Technical Assistance Program and Micro Lending activities.
The ECF did not partake in any economic
development activities where jobs were made available to low or moderate income persons,
but were not taken by them. ECF reports that a total of 5 full or part time jobs were
created or retained by beneficiaries through 2 loans totaling $45,467. Most beneficiaries
of 2000 ECF small business loans were to low/moderate income individuals. (ECF
beneficiaries are not required to submit information regarding individual employees.)
SECTION
3. HOME FUND NARRATIVE
A. Distribution of Funds
Akron prepared a five-year Consolidated
Strategy and Plan which covered the period of January 1, 1996 through December 31, 2000.
An annual plan for FY2000 covers the period from January 1, 2000 through December 31,
2000.
Akron's HOME Program covers priorities A, C
and D. The City of Akron utilizes its HOME funds to undertake homeowner rehabilitation
within targeted Neighborhood Housing Treatment areas and within Neighborhood Housing
Petition areas.
Homeownership Rehabilitation
The Neighborhood Housing Rehabilitation
Program is an on-going program in which both rental and homeowners are encouraged to
participate. Mandatory compliance with the Akron Environmental Health Housing Code is
required. Financial assistance is made available in terms of grants, matching grants and
low-interest loans. Improvements to public infrastructure are also undertaken.
HOME funds were used to undertake homeowner
rehabilitation for those owners whose incomes were below 80% of the median income as
defined by HUD. (Rental housing rehabilitation is undertaken with CDBG funds). HOME funds
were committed in the Glover, Mason Park, Goodyear, Manchester, Noble, Aqueduct, Crouse,
Victoria, Bisson and Kenmore II Neighborhood Development Areas. The City undertakes
rehabilitation in these areas over a four to five year period. Therefore, to understand
the total benefit to low-
income households within an area, all
program years should be considered.
The Neighborhood Housing Petition Program
began in June 1992. This program enables Akron residents within an eligible area
(generally the inner city) to petition the City for a housing improvement program in their
neighborhood. This program combines housing inspections and code enforcement with
financial assistance for repairs. The program is in the third round of petitions, which
began in the summer of 2000. A Neighborhood Housing Petition Program Committee was formed
to review the program petition procedures. Funds were budgeted for this program from both
HOME and CDBG. During the 2000 program year, HOME funding was used in the Leroy/Thornton,
Rhodes, Fern/Bellevue, Victory/Paris, Cuyahoga, LaCroix, Celina, West Thornton,
Robert/Weeks, Campbell, 5th Avenue and Fuller Petition Areas.
Of the 20 households assisted by HOME, 3
were at income levels below 80% of the median income but greater than 50%; a total of 3
were at income levels below 50%, and 3 were at income levels below 30% of the median.
Seven additional HOME petition program properties were rentals and not subject to income
calculation. The HOME application indicated that all funds would be expended on households
whose income did not exceed 80% of the median income.
Of the seven Petition program cases
assisted by the CDBG funds, three were rentals not subject to income calculations; three
were at income levels below 80% of median income but greater than 50%, and one was above
80%.
First-Time Homebuyers
The City of Akron did not use HOME funds
for its Home Purchase Incentive Program (HPIP). CDBG funds were used for this program.
However, the Community Housing Development Organizations did develop programs, which
utilize the HOME set-aside, for First-Time Homebuyers Programs. This is detailed in
Section C.
B. Private Sector Participation
The City of Akron has established long term
relationships with the major commercial banking institutions within the community to
provide affordable rehabilitation financing to lower income households. There are four
such agreements in place. HOME funds are used to "buy down" interest rates for
lower income households.
Additionally under the HOME Program, two
Community Housing Development Organizations (CHDOs) with which the City has contracted for
provision of affordable housing to lower income first-time homebuyers, have also
established separate but similar relationships with private lenders. These relationships
have resulted in the availability of affordable HOME purchase and rehabilitation financing
for HOME eligible homebuyers.
The City, in cooperation with the State of
Ohio, is participating in two low-income housing tax credit projects utilizing HOME funds
as well as local private financing and privately syndicated equity financing. The City
intends to continue to participate with non-profit and for-profit entities to maximize
their participation in provision affordable housing to lower income households.
(See HOME match report at the end of this
document.)
C. Minority Outreach
The City of Akron has established
procedures to identify, contact and solicit participation by minority and women-owned
businesses in the housing rehabilitation program. This activity has been closely monitored
to improve rates of participation. Rates of participation have increased through use of
new contractor selection methods as well as contractor recruitment efforts. (See Home
Program Annual Performance Report.)
D. Community Housing Development
Organizations
During FY2000, the City solicited
proposals from non-profit organizations serving the City of Akron to increase the supply
of housing affordable to low-income households. Akron has ongoing contracts to provide
low-income housing through five different programs.
HOME funds from the City and the State of
Ohio in a contract with East Akron Neighborhood Development Corporation (EANDC) were used
to sponsor a low-income tax credit new housing rehabilitation program. Permanent financing
for the project is being provided by First Merit Bank with equity invested from the
syndication of tax credits by Ohio Capital Corporation. The City of Akron provided
$240,444 in HOME funds to construct and rehabilitate 40 homes. The new single-family
detached homes are being constructed on scattered sites of previously vacant lots. The
rehabilitation homes were all previously vacant and abandoned structures.
East Akron Neighborhood Development
Corporation has developed South Akron Homes, Arlington Homes, and North Akron Homes. The
Housing Network conducts emergency home repairs and constructed 50 low income units at
Annunciation Terrace using $245,000 in HOME funds. B.I.C.E.E. is under contract for home
repair.
SECTION
4. HOPWA NARRATIVE
The City of Akron received no HOPWA funds
in 2000.
SECTION 5. ESG
NARRATIVE
A. Description of Emergency Shelter Grant Program
Activities
In 2000, the City of Akron received
Emergency Shelter Grant entitlement of $300,000. The City's activities emphasized funding
emergency and transitional facilities and assisting homeless persons to obtain permanent
housing.
The City's first ESG funding priority was
the rehabilitation of emergency and transitional facilities. The City is committed to
assuring that the community's facilities for the homeless provide decent, safe and
sanitary residence. Because of the transient nature of shelter operations, these
facilities incur significant wear and tear. As community facilities, it is important that
the physical condition of these facilities remain high to provide good living conditions
for the residents, to portray a good image of shelter operations, maintain acceptance of
the facility's presence, and be a positive physical aspect of the neighborhood in which it
is located.
The City's second 2000 funding priority was
for operating costs of shelter activities. The City emphasized the purchase of furniture
and equipment under this activity. Again, the City is concerned with maintaining a quality
living environment for residents and to respond to the inevitable wear and tear on
facilities.
The City's third funding priority was for
essential services, especially those that assist shelter residents to secure permanent
housing. In 1995, the City established a security deposit program to assist families
leaving the shelters to secure permanent housing. Other eligible activities considered for
funding would link residents with needed services or programs.
Activities are detailed in Priority F Table
in Section 1(A) of this report.
Process of Awarding ESGP Funds
The City sponsored a meeting of all
shelter and homeless service providers on September 8, 2000. At this meeting, the City
reviewed ESGP program requirements and described the City's funding goals as stated in the
application. The City solicited proposals from all interested parties, allowing
approximately 40 days to return proposals.
The City followed several policies in its
review of ESGP proposals:
- The City will provide assistance to a wide variety of
shelters, recognizing the variety of service needs.
- A division of support among emergency and transitional
facilities.
- An emphasis on rehabilitation of structures and the purchase
of furniture and equipment.
- An emphasis on the support of existing shelters which
continue to meet documented need over the funding of new shelters.
- New activities funded will support assistance in securing
transitional and permanent housing.
- The City will consider ESGP financial support of new
residential developments only if the most recent preceding development by that
organization has been outside of the City and is of similar or greater size than that
proposed for inside of the City. This policy will apply to all organizations developing
residential options for the homeless or special needs populations.
|
B. ESG Match The following table provides
description of matching fund sources and amounts for City funded programs. |
Program |
Resources
and
Program
Funds Used |
Amount
Invested
Committed
(Obligations) |
Amount
Invested
Expended |
Leveraging
of
Non-Federal
Resources |
Matching
Contributions |
a)
Salvation ArmyBooth Manor |
ESG FY 00 |
$14,000 |
$14,000 |
ODOD $43,912 Donations - $66,768 |
N/A |
b)
Shelter Care - Safe Landing |
ESG FY 00 |
$16,000 |
$16,000 |
HHS/Runaway and Homeless Youth Grant -
$150,000
Summit County Juvenile Court - $61,655
Child Guidance Center - $257,500
Summit County Children Services Board - $255,500
Youth Services Grant - $133,997 |
N/A |
c)
ACCESS |
ESG FY 00
FEMA |
$ 90,000
$ 16,000 |
$90,000 |
State ODOD/ESG - $121,300
United Way - $91,825
Church Grants $21,000
Private $115,667
County - $80,000University of Akron - $10,000 |
N/A |
d)
Battered Women's Shelter |
ESG FY 00 |
$7,000 |
$7,000
N/A |
Summit County Marriage license and divorce
fees - $7,000 |
N/A |
e)
Harvest Home and Haven of Rest |
No federal funds. Data provided for inf.
purpose |
N/A |
N/A |
71% private
10% church
19% other |
N/A |
f)
Community AIDS Network |
ESG FY 00
FEMA |
$15,000
$ 5,407 |
$15,000
N/A
N/A |
HOPWA - $18,000
Other - $20,390 |
N/A |
g)
H. M. Life Opportunities Transitional Housing Program |
ESG FY 00 |
$ 60,000 |
$6,000 |
HUD THDP - $165,500
Federal SAFAH - $42,500
Rental Income $35,500
OH Supportive Housing for Homeless - $88,000 |
Private funds (donations, 50% match of
federal funds for operating) |
h)
Legacy III |
ESG FY 00 |
$43,000 |
$43,000 |
State ODOD - $4,500
GAR Foundation - $10,000
Episcopal Community Serv. Fund $3,500
Program Service Fee - $6,588
Other - $5,000 |
|
i)
ACCESS
Step II |
ESG FY 00 |
$0
See ACCESS |
See ACCESS |
|
N/A |
j)
Fair Housing Contact Service - Damage Deposit Program |
ESG FY 00 |
$27,000 |
$27,000 |
|
|
k)
Community Support Services Edgeton Home |
ESG FY 00 |
$ 23,000 |
$ 23,000 |
|
N/A |
|
|
Notes on Financial and Affordable Housing Summaries:Through the course of 2000, the City of Akron
has progressed with proper system utilization. This year data assembled for the CAPER had
fewer discrepancies between IDIS reports and City internal records. |
SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES AND DISTRIBUTION (IN DOLLARS) |
Housing Rehab Programs |
2000 Federal
Funds Available |
2000 Federal
Funds Committed |
Total
Amount
Expended |
Leveraged Private Funds |
| |
CDBG |
HOME |
Public Improvements |
CDBG |
HOME |
Public Improvements |
CDBG |
HOME |
CDBG
P.I. |
|
Neighborhood Development & Petition
Areas |
790,000 |
1,745,000 |
1,535,000 |
775,279 |
1,503,450 |
4,147,105 |
124,377 |
1,156,476 |
2,162,887 |
1,562,026 |
All Minor Home Repair and Paint Projects |
245,000 |
____ |
____ |
236,122 |
____ |
____ |
236,122 |
____ |
____ |
____ |
|
Support Facilities /
Public Service |
Total Federal
Funds Available |
Total Federal
Funds Committed |
Total Amount
Expended |
Program Area |
CDBG |
HOME |
CDBG |
HOME |
CDBG
Grant/Contract |
HOME |
| CHDOs |
|
New Housing/Housing Repair |
|
Housing Net. |
|
BICEE |
|
EANDC |
|
WENDCO |
|
Annunciation |
|
$-0- |
$337,000 |
$71,537 |
$199,635 |
$51,507 |
$ 70,635 |
New Housing Incentive
Neighborhood Partnership Prog.
UNDC |
$ 75,000
50,000
400,000 |
|
$ 5,000
42,580
400,000 |
|
$ 1,953
7,500
400,000 |
|
General Admin.
Waiver Demolition Program |
$425,000
550,000 |
$205,000 |
$398,385
1,159,154 |
$464,718 |
$398,385
468,705 |
$237,938 |
NBD
Minority Business Tech. Asst. |
$275,000
50,000 |
|
$151,342
76,351 |
|
$141,323
-0- |
|
Public Services Human
Resources Programs |
$500,000 |
|
$541,035 |
|
$514,652 |
|
|

1990 Census Tracts
|

Akron Enterprise
Community
|
|